“Whoever witnesses the crescent of the month, he must fast the month."[TMQ 2:185] Today, the matter of when to begin the month of Ramadhan and when to celebrate the day of Eid ul-Fitr is a subject of controversy, dispute and debate the world over. Read more>>>
Talk at London Conference 26th June 2011. Dr Nazreen Nawaz - Hizb ut Tahrir Britain. Other speakers were Dr. Nicola Pratt (Associate Professor, International Politics of the Middle East, Warwick University) and Tasneem Al-Zeer (social networking activist and supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood)
Taqwa is one of the most profound concepts in Islam. It has been referred to numerous times in the Quran and Sunnah in order to emphasize its relevance and significance to Muslims. In fact, the word taqwa and its derivatives are mentioned in 239 verses of the Quran and mentioned countless times in the Sunnah of RasulAllah (saw). This emphasis is not surprising once we see that it is the key to happiness and success in this life and the hereafter. Taqwa is an avenue by which Muslims relate to one another in society and a means to channel their actions. Read more>>>
As the people in the Middle East are overthrowing their despotic dictators,a change that is being brought about by both men and women. Here we look at what is the political role of women under the Khilafah
Over a thousand women, Muslim and non-Muslim from across the UK and from Europe attended a conference in Central London on Sunday 20th March, organised by the women of Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain. The event aimed to counter the relentless accusations from the Western media and politicians regarding Islam’s oppression of women as well as to challenge the prevalent belief that women’s liberation can only be achieved through Western secular liberalism.
Speakers in the first half of the event highlighted that the historical and current agenda for the propagation of the narrative by Western politicians and governments that Islam oppresses the woman had no association with improving the lives of Muslim women. Rather it was and continues to be driven by political and economic motives including the need to justify occupation and colonisation of the Muslim world to secure control over the resources of the lands. The talks discussed how women in the Muslim world had been oppressed not by Islam but by non-Islamic traditional practices such as forced marriages, honour killings, and acid burnings as well as non-Islamic autocratic regimes that have brutally repressed women for decades and stripped them of basic rights. The second speaker highlighted how Western capitalist secular liberalism had failed to secure the dignity, safety, and wellbeing of women as evident in the epidemic levels of rape, sexual harassment, violence, and discrimination that still exist within such societies despite over 200 years of struggle for women’s rights. She emphasized that such systems have therefore lost all credibility in being presented as a model for women’s liberation globally and that there needed to be genuine consideration of Islam as an alternative system by which to secure the respect and rights of women and healthy cooperation of the genders.
The second half of the conference sought to dismantle the multitude of myths and lies regarding the status and rights of women in Islam. Speakers explained how gender differences in certain roles and rights in Islam have been interpreted as reflections of the inferiority and second class status of women while ignoring the numerous Islamic evidences that define the man and woman as equal in worth. They discussed how individual Islamic laws had been studied in isolation, detached from the overall impact that the Islamic social system seeks to achieve for society such as creating healthy interaction for the sexes, enabling women to have an active public life but within a safe environment, and generating strong harmonious family units where the rights of the wife, husband, and children are secured. Speakers presented a clear vision of the status, rights and role of women within a true Islamic system implemented by the Khilafah state. They explained how in contrast to the incompetent dictatorial regimes that currently plague the Muslim world, the Khilafah provided the practical mechanisms through its political, economic, educational, media, and judicial systems to radically improve the quality of the lives of Muslim and non-Muslim women in the Muslim world. Speakers described vividly how the Islamic laws when implemented by the Khilafah state would challenge problems such as female illiteracy, poor access to education, violence and abuse against women, discord within marriage and family life, and the absence of economic and political rights for women. Articles from the constitution adopted by Hizb ut-Tahrir for the Khilafah state were cited to aid the audience to clearly visualise how the rights of women would be secured and their status elevated under this Islamic system of governance. The final talk was a motivational address that showcased the global political work of the women of Hizb ut-Tahrir and encouraged attendees to support the call for real change in the Muslim world through the establishment of the Khilafah – a state that would stand as a beacon not simply for women’s liberation but the liberation of humanity.
The conference included interactive audience participation with many questions raised as to how Muslim women could engage with society to dispel the lies about women and Islam as well as aid the work to establish the Khilafah in the Muslim world.
The event ended on a very emotional note as one of the non-Muslim attendees embraced Islam. (Ends/)
With bombs and bans both being used to enforce freedom around the globe, liberalism has become the Cause célèbre of the Western world.
Today Monday 11th April 2011 marked a very important date in the history of ‘freedom’ for the world. From this day any woman in France caught wearing a Burqa (face veil) in any public place will be fined and put on a citizenship course. Any person who is accused of forcing a woman to wear the Burqa can face up to 2 years in prison. Of course women aren’t allowed to re-adorn the face veil if it is found that there are no oppressive Muslim men pulling their strings because the French liberal state knows what is best for Muslim women. Liberty it seems must be implemented at all costs, even if it means through the sanctioning of draconian laws.
France has for the last few weeks been at the forefront of delivering freedom of a different kind hundreds of miles away in Libya. This time not through bans but bombs under the pretext of liberating the oppressed subjects of Gaddafi’s rule.
As is often the case the Western world hides behind terms such as liberty and freedom, veiling the true ideological reasons for its actions. Just as the ban on building minarets in Switzerland was never about architecture, and the Danish cartoons were never about a free media, the Burqa ban in France isn’t about dress code.
The real reasons are about assimilation and control. A Muslim woman wearing a Burqa in the streets of France is making a statement. “I am Muslim, these are my values and I reject anything that goes against those values”. This statement was made by Kenza Drider a 32 year-old who travelled to Paris from Provence to show the world what she thought about laws which force her to abandon her Islamic values, she was of course promptly arrested. The official reason given for her arrest and that of others was unsanctioned protest and not the wearing of a Burqa, make of that what you will.
It is this very overt expression of an Islamic identity which is not secular and liberal that the French, the Swiss and the rest of Europe have an aversion to. For the militant secularists of the world it is nothing less than a slap in the face of liberalism.
Just as the Muslims in Libya don’t need the bombs of the West to express their opposition to Gaddafi, the Muslim women of this world don’t need to be de-veiled to have a voice. Kenza Drider is not unique in wearing the Burqa and expressing her opinions, the Muslim uprisings in the Middle East are full of women wearing the Hijab and Burqa. However when it fits the Western agenda, a woman in a Burqa protesting in Bahrain, Egypt or Yemen is an apparent voice for the very secular democracy that then forces her to accept liberalism.
The actions of the French are a clear acceptance that they have failed to convince Muslim men and women of secular liberalism and now they are willing to go to any lengths to enforce them. This is not a victory for the French by any means but an acceptance of defeat.
And how striking is this defeat: The full force of the French state apparatus man-handling and arresting women in effect ripping off their face veil while crying “but we’re preventing Muslim men from oppressing their women”. Who’s the oppressor? Take a look in the mirror, France!(Ends)
3/4; French Government Subjugates Muslim Women To Protect Secular Liberal Values
On Monday April 11th 2011, the French ban of the face veil in all public places came into force, criminalising Muslim women for simply dressing modestly. Any Muslim woman found wearing the face veil in public can now be forced to uncover and will either face a fine of 150 Euros or be required to take French citizenship classes, while any man found guilty of having pressured their female family members into adopting the niqab could face a fine of 30,000 Euros or a year in prison.
By forcing Muslim women to unveil, the French government has simply exposed the deficiencies, weaknesses and flaws of Western secular liberalism. The denial of medical treatment, access to education, limitation of freedom of movement, refusing child benefit payments, and consequently rendering to second class status women who hold an alternative view to secular philosophy, reflects the religious apartheid and fascist nature of French secular fundamentalism or ‘laicité’. It has shown itself to be an intolerant ideology where women are secluded from society simply for expressing modesty, where all talk of human rights is clearly a fallacy, and where liberté, egalité, and fraternité extends only those who tow the secular line.
Women forced to attend lessons on the values of French citizenship should presumably be taught about an ideology that teaches contempt for religion; that the French view of the woman’s dignity is to criminalise her for her religious dress; and that freedom extends to the right to exploit women through pornography and prostitution but not to the right for a woman to follow her religious convictions free from harassment. Supporters of niqab bans argue that the veil cuts women off from public life – the irony is that it is insults, prejudice, and bans against the dress that have achieved just that – imprisoned women to their homes.
The justifications for the ban are ludicrous. They criminalise the Muslim woman in order to set her free; strip her of her rights in order to secure her choice; stigmatize her in order to protect her; and subjugate her in order to liberate her! The irony seems to have been lost by the French parliament, composed primarily of men, that dictation to Muslim women how they should NOT dress and ordering them how to think through threats of fines is the height of male patriarchy – where’s the empowerment in this? Muslim women need no lessons in ‘female dignity’ from secular states that celebrate topless beaches and secure liberty to express promiscuity while outlawing modes of modesty. Nor do they need lectures on women’s subjugation by representatives of a system that gives freedom to the objectification of women on fashion catwalks, and though pornography and prostitution but labels as outdated the belief of a woman’s honour as being sacrosanct.
If the French government wanted to be a torch-bearer for women’s dignity, then why not appoint commissions investigating the degrading impact that prostitution, lap-dancing clubs, and the pornography industry have on the ‘dignity’ of all women within the society – all of which run freely in France and other capitalist liberal states under the premise of freedom of expression and driven by the pursuit of profit. Surely, for those who have a sincere concern for women’s rights, raising for debate these forms of degrading, dehumanizing, and devaluing women should be more pressing than a handful of Muslim women covering their faces out of religious devotion and modesty.
This racist, divisive piece of legislation will do nothing but throw fuel to the fire of racial tensions between communities. French politicians have been playing politics with their communities, competing in racist anti-Islamic rhetoric and policies to curry favour amongst their rising population of far-right voters, regardless of its detriment on society. It demonstrates that secular politics has no qualms in stigmatising, and whipping up frenzy and hysteria about its religious minorities or playing on irrational fears regarding Islam and Muslims in order to bag a few extra votes. The cut-throat opportunistic nature of secular politics is clear for all to see, where instigating prejudice against a community is an acceptable electioneering tool to win a few racist votes and where politicians seem more than willing to use the Muslim woman as political fodder to feed their public rankings. The alienation of Muslims and a divided society appears to be acceptable collateral damage to secure political mileage.
This ‘veil debate’ has exposed the failure of secular states to create harmonious cohesive societies where all feel equally respected. Discriminatory government policies and cheap secular politics that unscrupulously exploits xenophobia for political ambition, has fanned the flames of racism and fascism, stoking tensions between communities. It has provided ammunition for far-right groups with anti-immigrant agendas increasing racially motivated abuse. Bigoted vitriol was given a platform, entertained, and tolerated under the umbrella of strengthening national identity. It is all this that fuels prejudice and divides communities – not women’s clothing. Secularism’s aversion to religious pluralism has nurtured an environment where racial hatred has thrived.
Niqab bans enforced in France and Belgium and also under debate within other Western secular states such as Spain, Canada, Australia, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands have exposed the failure of secular liberalism to accommodate the rights of its religious minorities. Laws have been formed that target the minority based upon the prejudice of the majority. While secularism espouses freedom and claims to liberate Muslim women from lives of oppression, in reality it has treated them in true authoritarian fashion, legalizing religious intolerance and forcing them to relinquish their religious convictions in exchange for access to basic human rights. No longer can it be acceptable for advocates of the ideology to lay claim to its universality and neutrality in securing rights for all. So, although debate in the West has focussed on Islamic dress and whether it is appropriate for Western secular societies, the real debate to be had is whether secularism that is failing on so many fronts is appropriate to be idealized as the best system by which to organize society.
These niqab bans are simply desperate actions taken by desperate governments to try to stem the rise of Muslim women rejecting Western liberalism and adopting Islam as their spiritual, social, and political path in life. It is an attempt at forced secular conversion – forcing Muslim women to leave their Islamic values in exchange for Western ones. The idea of increasing numbers of women who having lived the Western dream, tasted the fruits of Western liberalism being unconvinced by its ideals, and now turning to Islam appears to be too hard a concept for die-hard secularist politicians to stomach. As Andre Gerin, the chair of the the French niqab commission said,“..the burqa is the tip of the iceberg…..Islamism really threatens us”. Ultimately, the outlawing of religious dress codes by Western governments symbolizes a failure to convince Muslim women intellectually of the superiority of secular liberal values. It speaks volumes about the intellectual fragility of any ideology that needs to use bully-boy fear tactics rather than strength of argument to persuade individuals to embrace its values.
So while many French and Western politicians have labelled the hijab and niqab as ‘symbols of oppression’, these veil bans are also a symbol. They are a ‘symbol of a weak ideology’ that needs to resort to force of law rather than force of argument to convince and a ‘symbol of the flawed and failing ideology of secularism’, whose staunch advocates would rather play politics with women’s clothes than engage in serious debate about the true causes of women’s oppression – including the detrimental impact of liberal culture on women’s lives and women’s respect.
In this increasingly intense climate of fear being generated around Muslim communities in the West, aimed at coercing them into leaving their Islamic values in exchange for Western ones, it is vital that as Muslim women we continue to hold firmly onto our Islamic beliefs. We should remember the promise from our Creator(swt) of the rewards awaiting those who are patient and steadfast in their deen during times of adversity and difficulty. Allah(swt) says,
“Verily, those who say, ‘Our Rabb(Lord) is (only) Allah and thereafter stand firm and straight (on the Islamic belief) on them shall be no fear nor shall they grieve. Such shall be the dwellers of Jannah(paradise), abiding therein (forever), a reward for what they used to do.” [Al-Ahqaf: 13-14] (Ends)
The Ummah has only three days and two nights to choose a Khaleefah, if they fail to do this after this time the obligation continues on all and those who undertake the Fard are saved from the sin. But those who neglect will be sinful for not fulfilling their Lord’s command and they will have to explain themselves to Him on the Day when His Account (Hisab) is swift. Read more>>>
New statistics from the Turkish Justice Ministry reveal that that murders of women in Turkey rose by 1,400% over seven years, from 2002 to 2009, with over 950 being killed in the first seven months of 2009 alone. According to the government study, “Research of Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey” almost 42% of women are subjected to violence in the country.
Turkey has been hailed by many Western politicians and commentators as a model for the future political system of Egypt and a new Arab world, praised for supposedly marrying a Muslim majority population with a secular liberal democratic system. This scandalous treatment of women within the country should give serious re-consideration of whether such a system can truly herald a positive future for the women of Turkey or the Arab world.
Dr. Nazreen Nawaz, Central Media Representative of Hizb ut-Tahrir commented, “Beyond the glossy exterior of Turkey’s economic growth lies the ugly social consequences of secular liberalism where women’s security and dignity are primary casualties. Some have blamed Islam’s prescription of defined roles for the genders in family life for this rise in violence towards women, such as the man as the head and guardian of the family, suggesting that this ‘inequality’ in gender roles breeds disrespect for the woman. However, if this is the case, what explains the epidemic level of violence against women in Western secular liberal democratic states where such Islamic rules do not exist and where numerous gender equality bills are enshrined in law? In the UK, 1 in 4 women face domestic violence, 2 die each week at the hands of their partner, and the police receive a call every minute from a victim of such abuse according to Home Office figures. In the US a woman is battered every 15 seconds by a partner according to FBI statistics.”
“The treatment of women depends upon the prevalent attitudes within any society and in secular liberal states a contradiction exists between the call for respect for women and liberal freedoms that either allow the exploitation of the bodies of women in advertising or entertainment that cheapens the view of women, or promote the belief that men are ‘free’ to treat women as their desires dictate. Under such systems, whether in the West or in Turkey, legal reforms to establish gender equality are hollow, meaningless words that have failed miserably to secure the safety and dignity of ordinary women. Women in Turkey have therefore borne the brunt of this detrimental system and its values. Islam in contrast may define specific gender roles in family life but also prohibits the exploitation that devalues women as well as vehemently rejecting the ‘freedom’ of men to view women as they wish that are 2 of the main contributors to domestic violence under secular liberal systems.”
“Women in the Muslim world cannot afford nor should they tolerate any more Western inspired foreign experiments in shaping the form of their political system. They should not settle for the least worst political option in levels of stability or repression in the region. The tried, tested, and failed secular liberal democratic system as seen from Bangladesh to Central Asia, Pakistan to Indonesia should be no model for those who have sacrificed so much for a brighter and more just future. A system that continues to ban Muslim women from access to educational and political institutions simply for adopting Islamic dress can surely never be an example to emulate for those whose heritage, beliefs, and strength lies in Islam.”
“Real change for women in the Muslim world will only materialise with the establishment of the Khilafah state shaped purely upon Islamic laws. This is a system that has also been tried and tested but with a track record of centuries of success in securing the rights and respect of women. This was a state that mobilised whole armies to protect the dignity of 1 woman; a state that recognised women’s important contribution to the politics of society and that encouraged female education and generated thousands of female scholars. It is a state that on re-establishment will use its political, educational, and media systems to nurture a mentality of elevated respect towards women within society – Muslim and non-Muslim – as obliged by Islam, with serious judicial repercussions if their dignity or physical wellbeing is harmed in any way.” (Ends)
The current debate on women's rights has until now been predominantly shaped by its progress in the west. The treatment of women in any society has become, without doubt, a key marker in evaluating its progress. The accepted framework of the debate on women's rights has centred on the need for 'equality'. After a century of struggle, many had thought that the glass ceilings have been shattered and there is no impediment to progression whatever your gender. But research from The UN's Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, paints a damning picture of daily life for women living in the UK who continue to fight for a fairer deal in society.
Speaker List:
Dr Nazreen Nawaz,
Islamic Speaker,
Freelance Writer and Author
Sue Mayer,
Feminist Speaker,
Freelance Writer and Author
Where: Queen Mary University, London, Room Francis Bancroft 2.40
“You are the best nation revealed for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah.” [TMQ 3:110]
The Messenger of Allah (saw) said:
“Whoever from amongst you sees an evil should change it by his hand, if he is unable to do so then he should change it by his tongue (by speaking against it), and if he is unable to do so then he should reject it in his heart and this is the weakest of Iman.” [Muslim]
Re-establishing the Islamic State is by no means an easy or straightforward task. There are several colossal obstacles facing the re-establishment of the Islamic State which first need to be removed and dismantled, and there are several major difficulties standing in the way of the resumption of the Islamic way of life which also need to be overcome. Read more>>>
Hijab is a word that indicates not just the headscarf but clothing in its entirety which meets the following conditions:
01. Clothing must cover the entire body, only the hands and face may remain.
02. The material must not be so thin that one can see through it.
03. The clothing must hang loose so that the shape / form of the body is not apparent.
04. The female clothing must not resemble the man's clothing.
05. The design of the clothing must not resemble the clothing of the non believing women.
06. The design must not consist of bold designs which attract attention.
07. Clothing should not be worn for the sole purpose of gaining reputation or increasing one's status in society.
The reason for this strictness is so that the woman is protected from the lustful gaze of men. She should not attract attention to herself in any way.
It is permissible for a man to catch the eye of a woman, however it is haram (unlawful) for a man to look twice as this encourages lustful thoughts. (Ends)
Reflecting on the examples of the Ansar reveals how vital their role was to the establishment of Islam as a political entity – a force that would become the launching point of the Islamic dawah – which spread from the borders of China to the borders of France in less than a hundred years. Read more>>>
A social problem, HRC estimations of unmarried Saudi women raise some awkward questions
A prominent member of the Kingdom's Human Rights Commission this week issued a warning about the growing number of unmarried Saudi women. There are at present, he reports, an estimated 1.2 million single women aged 32 years and over — one in 16 Saudi women. Moreover, the figure could rise to four million by 2015. Apparently, the number of single women is higher in the cities than in the countryside and the situation is worst in Makkah province that includes Jeddah.
Various reasons for this are cited — changing social traditions as well as growing unemployment and a housing shortage. Certainly, it is true that young men find it difficult to contemplate marriage without a secure job or a home to offer their bride. All the anecdotal evidence points to Saudis marrying later. If true, it is bound to have a downward pressure on the population growth, currently put by the government at 2.3 percent but by others at 1.5 percent.
But these estimations raise some awkward questions. Assuming that the numbers of male and female Saudis are roughly balanced (which, in fact, they are not — there are more men than women), then what about the men? Are there currently 1.2 million Saudi men over 32 who are unmarried? Are there going to be 4 million unmarried men in 2015? Why is no one worried about them? Or will that be sorted out by them all marrying foreign wives?
The figures are certainly startling. But are they correct? A little number crunching, in fact, gives a rather different picture.
The census last year showed that the population of Saudi Arabia was 27,136,977 — made up of 18,707,576 Saudis and 8,429,401 expatriates. Of the Saudis, 9,527,173 (52 percent) were male and 9,180,403 (49 percent) female.
It is widely accepted that 70 percent of the Saudi population is under 30 years of age. If so and there are 9.18 million females, that means that there are approximately 2.3 million women aged over 32 at present. So if 1.2 million are unmarried, that means that over half of all Saudi women aged over 32 are currently unmarried.
That does not conform to the reality most of us know. Nor does it conform to the figure quoted above of one unmarried woman among every 16 women aged over 32.
So what about the estimated 4 million unmarried women in four years' time?
The Saudi population is rising. But we already roughly know how many women aged over 32 there will be in 2015 since all were born earlier than 1983. There will be about 900,000 more than today. In other words, 4.1 million in 2015. Of these, it is suggested four million will be unmarried. Saudi Arabia is changing, but not to the extent where over 90 percent of women are not marrying or delaying it till into their thirties.
The lesson here is obvious. First check the statistics. Nonetheless, there is an important issue that needs to be addressed. Saudi women, like Saudi men, are marrying later.
It is a worldwide phenomenon. But is it desirable?
